La econoblogósfera de A. Villagómez

En su tintero económico, Alejandro Villagómez pone una breve lista con la econoblogósfera en México:

Moraleja: Muy contento con  la inclusión. Un pequeño reconocimiento a esta bitácora con casi tres años circulando.

Las presas y las emisiones de GEIs

Hay alguna literatura sobre las emisiones de las presas vs las de carbón, pero un poco desorgazinada. En lo que armo algo un tanto más organizado, pero que puede tardar, pongo esta pieza, que resume bien el punto, y dos cuadros del reporte de la comisión mundial de presas. Resalto el párrafo que resume los resultados en los que me baso para criticar las presas tropicales.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7046

Hydroelectric power's dirty secret revealed

• 14:29 24 February 2005 by Duncan Graham-Rowe
• For similar stories, visit the Energy and Fuels Topic Guide

Contrary to popular belief, hydroelectric power can seriously damage the climate. Proposed changes to the way countries' climate budgets are calculated aim to take greenhouse gas emissions from hydropower reservoirs into account, but some experts worry that they will not go far enough.

The green image of hydro power as a benign alternative to fossil fuels is false, says Éric Duchemin, a consultant for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). "Everyone thinks hydro is very clean, but this is not the case," he says.

Hydroelectric dams produce significant amounts of carbon dioxide and methane, and in some cases produce more of these greenhouse gases than power plants running on fossil fuels. Carbon emissions vary from dam to dam, says Philip Fearnside from Brazil's National Institute for Research in the Amazon in Manaus. "But we do know that there are enough emissions to worry about."

In a study to be published in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Fearnside estimates that in 1990 the greenhouse effect of emissions from the Curuá-Una dam in Pará, Brazil, was more than three-and-a-half times what would have been produced by generating the same amount of electricity from oil.

This is because large amounts of carbon tied up in trees and other plants are released when the reservoir is initially flooded and the plants rot. Then after this first pulse of decay, plant matter settling on the reservoir's bottom decomposes without oxygen, resulting in a build-up of dissolved methane. This is released into the atmosphere when water passes through the dam's turbines.

"Drawdown" regions

Seasonal changes in water depth mean there is a continuous supply of decaying material. In the dry season plants colonise the banks of the reservoir only to be engulfed when the water level rises. For shallow-shelving reservoirs these "drawdown" regions can account for several thousand square kilometres.

In effect man-made reservoirs convert carbon dioxide in the atmosphere into methane. This is significant because methane's effect on global warming is 21 times stronger than carbon dioxide's.

Claiming that hydro projects are net producers of greenhouse gases is not new (New Scientist print edition, 3 June 2000) but the issue now appears to be climbing up the political agenda. In the next round of IPCC discussions in 2006, the proposed National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Programme, which calculates each country's carbon budget, will include emissions from artificially flooded regions.

But these guidelines will only take account of the first 10 years of a dam's operation and only include surface emissions. Methane production will go unchecked because climate scientists cannot agree on how significant this is; it will also vary between dams. But if Fearnside gets his way these full emissions would be included.

With the proposed IPCC guidelines, tropical countries that rely heavily on hydroelectricity, such as Brazil, could see their national greenhouse emissions inventories increased by as much as 7% (see map). Colder countries are less affected, he says, because cold conditions will be less favourable for producing greenhouse gases.

Despite a decade of research documenting the carbon emissions from man-made reservoirs, hydroelectric power still has an undeserved reputation for mitigating global warming. "I think it is important these emissions are counted," says Fearnside.

Cuadro 1

Entre 1% y 28%. 

Cuadro 2

En los reportes estimados las emisiones de la presa Tucurui son al menos tan grandes como las de las plantas de gas de ciclo combinado. Fearnside las pone por arriba de todas.

Fuente: WCD, 2000. http://www.dams.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49&Itemid=29

Moraleja: Algunas presas no tienen un impacto en emisiones tan fuerte- Pero las brasileñas sí. Y las emisiones son sólo un aspecto. Hay más impactos económicos por daños ambientales no estimados...